Dr. Aleksandra Peeva

Gastdozentin

Dr. Aleksandra Peeva

John F. Kennedy Institute für Nordamerikastudien

Abteilung Wirtschaft

Adresse
Landstraße 7-9
Raum 206
14195 Berlin

Sprechstunde

Während der Semesterferien nur nach Absprache.

Education

Ph.D. in Economics, Humboldt University of Berlin 2013-2018

Dissertation Title: “Essays on Trade and Economic Sanctions"

Advisors: Prof. Marcel Fratzscher, Prof. Nikolaus Wolf

 

Academic and Employment Career

PhD Fellow, DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), 2013-2018

Guest Researcher, International Monetary Fund, Research Department, Open-Economy Macroeconomics Division, 2014

Intern, DIW econ GmbH, 2012

Intern, German Federal Ministry of Finance, 2010

Intern, BDI (Federation of German Industries), 2010

Intern, GIZ GmbH (German Corporation for International Cooperation), 2009

US Economic Policy, Master's level, John F. Kennedy Institute, Free University Berlin, 2018, 2019

Development of the American Economy, Bachelor's level, John F. Kennedy Institute, Free University Berlin, 2018, 2019

US-China Trade Relationship, Master's level, John F. Kennedy Institute, Free University Berlin, 2017

Advanced Macroeconomic Analysis, PhD level, Free University Berlin, 2016

International Economics, Master's level, Hertie School of Governance, 2015

The Persistent Effect of Sanctions on Trade

Using a country-pair panel of economic sanctions from 1965 to 2005, I estimate the effect of sanction imposition on bilateral trade flows. I explore both trade dynamics during the sanction period, as well as the long-run effect on trade after the sanction is lifted. I find that trade flows between sanction sender and target drop substantially after the sanction starts. These effects are long-lived, and persist well after the sanction has ended. There is no negative effect of the sanction on targets total trade. The sanctioned country is able to divert trade towards non-sanctioning competitors of the sanction sender. 

 

Did Sanctions Help Putin?

Do sanctions strengthen the targeted regime? I analyze the 2014 imposition of Western sanctions on Russia and its impact on voting. The US and the EU introduced targeted measures against Russian entities and individuals related to Putin’s regime. Using polling station-level data I investigate whether Putin gained relatively more support among those local constituencies which were geographically close to a sanctioned firm. I find a significant effect of targeted sanction imposition on the vote share in presidential elections between 2012 and 2018. Putin gained 1.54 percentage points at those polling stations that had a sanctioned firm in immediate vicinity. Targeted sanctions imposition also affected voter turnout. The effect on voting can be explained as rally-around-the-flag in the face of sanctions, as long as voters did not endure economic losses through a decline in some sanctioned firms economic performance.

 

Strategic Goods Trade Bias in Human Rights Sanctions

I study whether there is a strategic goods trade bias in human rights sanctions. I exploit bilateral commodity-level data on trade between human rights-concerned countries and human rights violators between 1972 and 2005. I show that human rights-abusing countries exporting energy and nuclear products are sanctioned less often. Exports of nuclear goods and armaments by human rights-concerned countries to human rights abusers also mitigate the use of sanctions. Economic rationales and not geopolitical considerations explain the impact of strategic trade on sanction use.